Thursday, 26 February 2015

Update: SEBI ( PROHIBITION OF INSIDER TRADING) REGULATIONS, 2015- A Welcome Change?

Exercising its power under various provisions of the SEBI Act, 1992 the Securities Exchange Board has come up with SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015. These regulations will come into force on 120th day of publication in the official Gazette.
This post aims to analyze these regulations from the perspective of amendments to the existing regulations and the novel concepts introduced under the new regulations.
Following are the major changes which are aimed by the new Regulations in regulating the Insider Trading framework in India:
v  Applicability of the Regulations
Under regulation 3(1) of the 2015 regulations the charge of insider trading has been extended to securities listed and proposed to be listed on stock exchanges. This is an expansion from the 1992 Regulations where-under the same regulation was applicable only with respect to companies that were listed. The probable reason for such a change is to bring within its purview those securities which will be amenable to price discovery through market interplay.[1]

v  Notes to interpretation
Every provision under the 2015 Regulations is accompanied with specific notes setting out the legislative intent for which that provision has been formulated. This reflects the substance over form approach, these notes will aid in capturing the spirit of the legislation and how the regulatory is likely to look at its enforcement.

v  Definitional Changes
1.      Under the new regulations the definition of ‘Insider’ has been simplified to mean a person who is a connected person and those in possession of ‘Unpublished price sensitive Information’.[2]
2.      The definition of ‘Connected person’ has now been given a broader meaning even including the public servants and holders of statutory offices who are can be reasonably expected to have access to UPSI. The immediate relatives of the connected persons are also considered as connected persons unless they can prove that they didn’t have access to the UPSI.[3]
3.      Under regulation 2(n) of the 2015 Regulations, the criteria for what constitutes ‘unpublished price sensitive information’ would be whether the information is ‘generally available’ or not.
4.       Under 2(n) of 2015 only the definition of ‘unpublished price sensitive information’ has been extended to both a company and securities whereas it was limited to only companies in the previous regulations.

v  Rebuttable Presumption
It is clarified that the presumption against persons deemed to be ‘connected’ is rebuttable under the Regulation 4(2). This provision is akin to the presumption that exists against various persons having a common objective or purpose of acquisition i.e. persons acting in concert under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover) Regulations, 2011.

v  Prohibition on Insider Trading
Under the 2015 regulations multiple restrictions have been placed i.e.
 (i) Prohibition on communication of unpublished price sensitive information[4];
(ii) Procurement of unpublished price sensitive information,[5] and
(iii) Trading in securities when in possession of unpublished price sensitive information.[6]
It has to be noted that the 1992 Regulations prohibited ‘dealing’ in securities when in possession of unpublished price sensitive information, amongst others; the expression ‘dealing’ has been replaced with ‘trading’ in securities in 2015 . Under the new Regulations, the definition of ‘trading’ has been kept wide to curb activities which are not strictly buying, selling or subscribing such as a pledging etc.
v  Exclusions
The 2015 Regulations provide for certain exclusions where the charge of insider trading will not get attracted, namely:-
Ø  In the conduct of due diligences: Communication and procurement of information in connection with transactions involving PIPE, mergers and acquisitions, subject to certain conditions;[7]
Ø  For off-market transactions between promoters who are in possession of the same information, and are making a conscious and informed decision;[8]
Ø  In case of non-individual insiders:--
The individuals who were in possession of such unpublished price sensitive information were different from the individuals taking trading decisions and such decision-making individuals were not in possession of such unpublished price sensitive information when they took the decision to trade;[9]
Ø  When the trade was executed in the absence of any leakage of information, thereby recognising the concept of ‘chinese walls’ in large organisations;
Ø  When trades executed in pursuance of trading plans.

v  Disclosure Obligations
The disclosure obligations under the Regulations have been limited to ‘insiders’ and are as follows:
Initial disclosures of trades to be made by only the promoters, key managerial personnel, directors internally;[10]
Continual disclosures to be made by every promoter, employee or director in case value of trade exceed monetary threshold of ten lakh rupees over a calendar quarter; company to accordingly notify stock exchanges within 2 trading days;[11]
Earlier disclosure requirement for persons holding more than 5% shares or voting rights or in case of any further change in their shareholding or voting rights has been done away with.
The disclosures of trading in securities shall also include trading in derivatives of securities if permitted under law (to be noted that section 194 of the Companies Act, 2013 prohibits Director or KMP from entering into forward dealings etc.)

v  Trading Plans
It is a novel concept to India, provisions on ‘trading plans’ have been introduced whereby every insider is entitled to execute trades in pursuance of pre-determined trading plan in accordance with the Regulations.[12]
v  What is Trading plan
It is basically introduced with the aim to have transparent frame for trading in securities by those insiders who are having unpublished price sensitive information through the year. The insider would be required to submit trading plan in advance to the compliance officer for his approval. The compliance officer is also empowered to take additional undertakings from the insiders for approval of the trading plan. It shall be submitted for a minimum period of 12 months. Trading can only commence only after 6 months from public disclosure of plan. Compliance officer will  approve the plan. The trading plan once approved shall be irrevocable and the insider shall mandatorily have to implement the plan, without being entitled to either deviate from it or to execute any trade in the securities outside the scope of the trading plan.(Except in few case like where insider is in possession of price sensitive information at the time of formulation of the plan and such information has not become generally available at the time of the commencement of implementation)
v  Compliance Officer
Qualification criteria have been set for a compliance officer who shall report to the board of directors of the company or the head of the organization, as the case may be.
The compliance officer’s role in monitoring and approving a trading plan has been made important. Enhanced role for the compliance officer who would need to police, monitor and regulate trading by employees and connected persons. Regulation 5(3)

v  Penalties
No separate penalties have been prescribed under the Regulations. Reference is made however to the penalty provisions under the SEBI Act, 1992 which shall apply. As per the Act, insider trading is publishable with a penalty of INR 250,000,000 (Rupees Two Hundred Fifty Million Only) or 3 times the profit made out of insider trading, whichever is higher.

v  ANALYSIS

Ø  While some of the Regulations have been enacted at par with the international practices to bring more clarity (substance over form approach), some of the Regulations are more onerous and testing for the corporate to implement at initial stage.
Ø   The Regulations are precisely more clear in some aspects say as on what to be construed as price sensitive information by defining specifically “generally available information” separately.
Ø  The landmark deviation in new Regulations in context to the 1992 regulation is right of defense by the insider to rebut the charges of insider trading.
Ø  The Regulations though establish all together a new set of governance by legislating these Regulations in all-inclusive way covering disclosures of trading by KMP/Directors/promoters as well as employees on crossing the threshold of Rs. 10 lakh in value.  Regulation 7(2)(a).
Ø   On the other hand, some Regulations have been left for open ended for discussion requiring clarity such as whether the stock options granted to employees can be exercised by employee during closure of trading window.
Ø  Another ambiguity in the Regulations relates to the requirement of disclosure of trades in securities by directors, promoters as well as employees on crossing the threshold of Rs. 10 lakhs in value, which seems to be too much arduous for the companies. It would have been more rational to have the requirement of continual disclosure limited to KMP/directors/promoters on threshold at higher value say Rs. 15 or 20 lakh.
Ø  At the same time it has to be kept in mind that these regulations have not been enforced as of now and will only come into force on the 120th day of its publication in the Gazette which suggests there is still time to correct the ambiguities before it finally comes into force.





[1] Insider Trading Norms Revisited: An Analysis of the N.K. Sodhi Committee Report, Nishith Desai Associates.
[2] Regulation 2(g), SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
[3] Regulation 2(d), SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
[4] Regulation 3(1), SEBI ( Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
[5] Regulation 3(2), SEBI ( Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
[6] Regulation 4, SEBI ( Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
[7] Regulation 3(3) (i), SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
[8] Regulation 4(1) (i), SEBI ( Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
[9] Regulation 4(2) (a), SEBI ( Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015        
[10] Regulation 7(1) (a), SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
[11] Regulation 7(2) (a), SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
[12] Regulation 5(1), SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.

No comments: